>>20082919>I'm gonna go with 'no', because I consider the creative process to be integral to a piece of artCreation requires ideation and execution, that's true. However, it seems a large part of your argument is that art can only happen if the execution requires a lot of effort. If you follow that line of argument then where is the cutoff between someone toiling sufficiently and not. There are always these cases where it "came in a flash of inspiration". That is what flow-state usually is, then it's a race against time to get the idea into a physical form before it is gone. If the process takes too long the creation is lost.
>A more interesting ideaNot really. The only difference is you are asking for the transcription process to not work well in one shot.
In any case, where I was leading with this is of course that pretty soon such devices may exist, in one form of another, and then people will be back here saying, but these people with ideas aren't artists because they just snapshotted their minds, they didn't even prompt.
