>>4111574For a man to love traps is not gay by any measure, for traps embody the true form of feminine Beauty, which suffers no constraint by any earthly gender but is rather fulfilled in all feminine bodies regardless of their biological origins. For example one might love and admire a statue of a woman, but we would never call such a person a statue-lover, for it is the form of the Female which is instantiated in the statue that this person admires; likewise with traps. We see that there are some who love traps but despise overly-masculine bodies, and for these people, it is not proper to speak of them as being gay at all, for the nature of gayness, if gayness were to exist is the love of a gender which is the same as yours. This love is something which has its timeless origin in the domain of Forms before it could ever become instantiated in the world of bodies. Therefore, it is not gay to love traps, for one loves not the earthly body of a young boy but a transcendent Woman-Beauty that is fundamentally female in nature and completely incorporeal.
But what if you want to fuck it because you know it's a trap? Then you want to fuck it for the small part of it who is still masculine, which means you want to fuck it because he's a man. The only condition where traps are not gay is where you're unaware of it.
This happened to a good friend of mine a few years ago: he started dating a trap without knowing, and only discovered it was a dude a few months afterward. In that case, I wouldn't consider their relation homosexual because my friend didn't know any better and loved this person for the womanly part.
But even then, you can't really say that traps are 99% feminine, because the vast majority don't really act like women, and more like an independent entity: their behavior rarely imitate with great fidelity those of women, so it's fair to assume that traps, if not entirely gay, are definitely not heterosexual.
