>>1792001>I don't have to prove anything to you because you're the one making (bogus) claims and I'm simply questioning them.You seem to be very confident that there is indeed a question, that's why I asked, I already proved my point numerous times.
>>1792001>"posting a complete logical non-sequitur"That word-of-the-day email subscription really is paying off right now eh?
>"If you choose an answer to X at random, what is the chance you will be correct?"What about the 4 options you dumb ass? This isn't an open question (if it were, then you would be right on this). The 4 “choices” imply that a question was posed for them. (As any standard quiz does) This pretty much is the whole trick of the paradox, it deludes you to think that there IS a question to the answer.
