>>19995974kek you sure you wanna throw down with planes mate?
You do know that conservation of momentum wears off when they leave the ground under their own power right and that the higher they go the less the atmosphere has the same forces applied to it which means the planes lose it even faster up there right?
So given that must be the case how is it that you can fly a plane from a to b thousands of miles away when the rotation of the earth would fuck your direct line to the destination? Are you meant to take a curved path? Guess where it will be in the future and fly to that location instead?
How about landing in general? After hours in the air and losing that conservation of momentum you do no regain it as you descend which means the ground will be moving considerably faster, sometimes hundreds of miles faster than the plane would even cruise at, than you would be going as you approach it. How are you meant to catch up to the earth? What if you're flying north to south and the rotation is going east to west, how are you going to account for that sideways motion while landing?
Oh and let's not forget about the horizon rising and falling to eye level as you go up and down in an aircraft too which should be impossible on a globe as it should always be falling away...
Do you want to know why literally every flight manual says that you must assume the earth to be flat and stationary? It's because they have to in order to fucking work at all. Pic very related...
As for the mapfag I'm not going to waste my time trying to entertain you. I've said what needs to be said and shit on you entirely as is with nothing more to gain from wrecking you even further since you will ignore it all and come back saying the same shit about maps tomorrow. Very kike behaviour mate...
