>>20124453>>20124545I just took a look with the magnification loupe and didn't find anything suspicious, but i wasn't too sure what to look after. There are some kind of tiny "globules" appearing under the x60 but i believe it's from some kind of veneer used to preserve the coin.
If both bob & scrapfren agree on the coin then i can stop being paranoid, not that it would have been a huge loss anyway, it's a very common tiny bronze.
> I poked it and under thin copper plating a white/grey pewtery metal shined through.perfidious chinknesium know no boundaries, feel bad for you bro.
>I still need a nice big wide follis of Justinian to upgrade a corroded example I have, they can be over 40mm wide so nicely struck specimens are pretty impressiveI scored this one not long ago in a lot of roman coins, a year 31. I wish i had a camera to give it justice because the coin is gorgeous IRL.
