>>17511614>Today people see this as misogyny, but do you hate children? Do children deserve to be abused?based and correct. this is a highly appropriate analogy but not perfect. women and children are both underdeveloped solipsists, who as a result are incapable of true responsibility. if they can't be responsible, then hating them is pointless and even immoral; but with children, part of the point of withholding scorn/contempt is because they are still developing. they have time to learn and grow, so it's important to be forgiving and understanding (usually). not women, though.
adult women are terminal. they peak at 19-20, and after that they are basically done developing. they can't really improve themselves, because they are psychologically delicate. like a plucked flower, it cannot grow and any damage is permanent. even their self-inflicted wounds can never really heal, e.g. being a dumb whore, getting used up and destroying their pair-bonding ability. they will always be looking for someone who's ready to accept responsibility for their past actions so they can resume their carefree, childlike solipsism. if you're a beta, that means you. where children grow, women can only decay and accumulate problems they intend to foist off onto other somehow. this is evident in their politics. even the best women in a vacuum can only partially preserve their quality against natural forces over time.
the one important exception is when certain women become mothers. they can level up onto another plane entirely. this doesn't seem to happen for most women, especially lately, but I've seen it. a good woman who commits fully to being a good mother is worth more than 99% of men could ever hope to be. that's like one woman in a thousand at best, though.
