>>10782379Like I said I would only befren someone I see as human. The above human below human stuff is just a simplification because most people don't understand it when you say below/above a person.
>if i am superior to you than i am above you You are still a human though and should see other people as a humam
>a king wouldnt really have a good peasant friend In this case the human part implies the league in which he is. Compared to him a peasant would be an insect
>>10782389Argentina is a lawless country
