>>20816512literary juxtaposition. perhaps a better way of formulating such thesis would be to state;
you type like a jungle coon therefore you are a nigger. you fuck men in the asshole and take dick up the ass for free, therefore you are a faggot. therefore you are a nigger-faggot.
but the question itself was; are you a nigger-faggot? the question is thus made moot by the thesis is it not? you would not be given much opportunity to participate in discourse or converse as the thesis has laid this before you. you would be discussing the thesis and not the question.
so let try again with no thesis.
>are you a nigger-faggot? 