>>15599759>We found a bit more than just a skull of an Australopithecus>posts artificial replica instead of the tiny pieces they actually foundNo "you" found a bunch of bones scattered over hundreds of feet at each site and several countries and assume it's from the same animal and artistically invent the relevant parts you need. I don't share your many religious assumptions surrounding this process.
The most likely explanation by far is that you found bits and pieces of modern humans with bone malformations and combine them with other animals and create a magic ancestor. You absolutely never EVER find these fossils in a complete form like we easily do for thousands of other fossils of similar size.
>Scientists can tell by the ankle of the knee and ankle joints that it was bipedal.It took almost 30 years for them to decide that. They can't "tell" anything, they decide it fits the narrative and go with it, nothing more. I don't share this religious assumption from from one of the most laughable soft science fields