>>15938648I agree with you 100%, the negative responses you get are just becuase you're challenging their mental paradigm and thus they feel personally attacked. Nobody likes to think that when they've just had a child they've condemned someone to suffer and die, regardless of whatever good might happen in between the suffering and death. They don't want to realize that they are the metaphysical hangman, the bearer of the noose, for their own child and so they project blame onto you in the form of "if life is so X why don't you do Y??" or they try and absolve themselves of blame by invoking a third party like spirits, angels, god(s) etc.
What do you think of this argument, by the way?
>if you're born and you suffer at all then it'd be better to have never existed since you'd be unable to experience good (which is simply the avoidance of the bad) or the bad itself>if you experience only happiness 100% of the time then death (which is inevitable) is bad because your happiness will end whether you want it to or not and thus it'd have been better to have never existed at all to experience the happiness and the knowledge that it'll all be taken awayI'm curious what you think.
You're doing great work here and I hope your threads continue for a long time so whatever these misguided and deformed specimins say, always remember you have at least one supporter here who agrees with you in full.
