>>1786220>No it is not. Scroll up a bit and see all the answers you got. How is that clear?The fact that people gave a bunch of wrong answers doesn't mean that the intent is unclear.
>Since we do not know all the (hidden) assumptions, and also because the language isn't logically precise...You don't ever read the posts you respond to, do you? Like I said, you could make this complain about any question formulated in a natural language. Does this mean that (
>>1781549) is a philosophical question, or that the average SAT math problem is a philosophical question? Not in any meaningful sense.
