Quoted By:
star trek is more star wars than trek nowadays.
and star wars is ... just bad.
what a weird world.
if they made a spiritual TNG-era successor, like say have another relative outcast from the theater sector as the charismatic and effective bridge captain, who has his command supplemented with a diverse cast of both "heroes" and "villains" who each have their own skills and interests and pseudo backstories i.e. Garak from DS9; if the crew had a smaller ship but a wider mission, and had one really good super-expensive CGI alien as the "outsider" character (a narrative role filled on the bridges of prior series using the "trek" casting method by characters such as spock, data, odo, Q, 7 of 9, worf etc.), had an episodic method using their old tried-and-true sparse over-arching linearity or canon between episodes except for multi-episodes, start, mid, and end-of-season episodes, and hired some actually good writers (or ex-writers) to do the show and planning and general story with full attention to trek die-hard nerd-tier series lore; and if the episodes were centered around small general episode-contained threats or emergencies stemming of the investigative, diplomatic, espionage, militaristic, "mundane everyday life," or explorative abnormalities; all of the resulting show from this would be generally agreed-upon to be having quite a good decent offing of being actually good trek again.
and make the crew like each other