>>13528425>poisoning the well Christianity it semetic, because Christians are the jews Christ was talking about. Christians do not have to do all those rituals before Christ came, for the same reason that Christ ended all of those customs and now all you have to do is rely on Christ for what you cannot do yourself. Mossad and athiests like to come on /pol/ and implicated that Christians are jews in an attempt to confuse what used to be a primarily Nazi based strawmen concoction that mossad erected as a boogeyman for funding. I find it ironically hilarious that there are still people on this board whom unironically believe that Christianity isn't Jewish, but then again the big funny moment is that they can't seem to connect the dots when Hitler didn't go after Christians for this very reason, because if you read mienkampf hitler specifically said that the jews in question where all communist, and that it was very well document that most of the commies by proxy due to their interests were also Jewish. But these jews were the same caliber of supposed self acclaimed jews that are just larping Ashkenazi's, that took the place of the jew after Hadrian wiped them out shortly after they had rebelled in the early 3rd-4th century. These jews coincidentally are also identified with the language by christ specifically mentioning that these "jews" in this context still go to synagogues. Meaning that Christ nor Hitler is talking about Christians here. Is it a semetic schism? No, because God specifically stated that race nor nationality had anything to do with the covenant after Christ. As this metaphysical context pertains to universalism as Truth needs to be presented in a universal context in order for it to be thus. The best you retards can do is call me a kike, or conflate some stupid strawman imagery that you gatekeeping cunts using nazi flags at mossad erected shortly after you went with the 'nazi' angle in 2015.
>inb4 so and so was "anti semetic" 