>>12303559>>12303558You are right that we have forgotten the natural order, but you yourself are misconstrued on it. The bird of prey is superior to the fish when it enters conflict, the bird of prey feeds on the fish and thus the natural hierarchy of ecology is formed. The natural order is a hierarchy and that you try to represent order as anything other than a chain of ascension is your own failure of understanding. Your most correct assertion is that we have forgotten our place in it. We, as a people, have gotten high off of our parasite's supply of victim-baiting propaganda and in our weakest attempts as a society to seem stable we chase after the trends of those we know to be our rulers and enact this self-destructive ideology in our own lives. And I speak of the populace in general. The natural order would not have us self-effacing and clamoring to see who can race to the bottom in the new inverted hierarchy. My point of this writing being that if you are right about us forgetting our place then it can't be simply that we forget superior or inferior is a relation in regards to conflict in an inevitable arena of life. The rules of nature are such that the conflict ultimately shows which area of the arena is truly necessary and how that makes the other strong or weak.
