>>10058991You're quite forward my french visitor. Of course you'll understand that I'm skeptical of your desires. Please explain the logic and emotion behind your desire so that we can come to a better understanding as you are not the first to express this desire; however, you are the first to declare your desire with such veracity.
>>10059020Go on ahead dear. There's no need to be afraid.
>>10059024Yours is a desire of connection. To love individuals must connect on both a physical and emotional level with a mutual agreement to respect each others desires. Without this mutual respect and connection love will be all but a fools errand keeping idle hands and minds busy. To achieve what you desire you will need to bridge the gap between cultures, opinions, perspectives and convictions to connect with as many as possible and convince them of the terms of mutual respect for one another.
>>10059032>Is it perpetuated by chan culture alone?Of course not. The sentiment of offloading your individuality to assist another is scoffed at by almost every modern person but it is more pervasive in forum cultures. Look around and you will see a million reasons other than the true reason why people believe they are miserable from money to love. None of them realize that they have surrendered themselves to their own internal demons which are manifesting themselves in an attempt to broaden the reach of this ideal. Misery loves company and more often than not modern chan culture is at the helm of perpetuating this misery. Slowly others gravitate towards this idea of individuality over connection that they opt out of even the most basic of positive interactions. Of course this isn't to say that media and modern entertainment isn't intentionally deceiving the masses into a false sense of security built around a flawed concept of happiness. The material can never bring permanent happiness and will never fulfill your every desire.
