>>20249522>The technology doesn't exist and it'll be literal decades (most likely 50+ years)So you claim to understand the trends better than most technologically involved people and high tech companies that currently allocate their capital appropriately, indicating a singularity in two decades from now?
>to put the tens of billions of dollars needed to invent the robowaifus he's thinking of. That is again missing the point. Again, you can't pretend to be retarded when an extrapolation of a trend is not convenient for you. That's what capitalism does. The amount of resources poured into robotics right now suggests you are wrong, or rather, the epistemological self-aware part of capitalism decided that AI and robotics are immensely important and transformative in the next two decades. Your failure to front-run and decode the trends, versus the immense mass of the self-excitative technocapital. Who am i gonna trust? Hmmmmm.jpg
Anon is right to bring about the discussion of robotwAIfus, because that's how hyperstition works. And capitalism agrees. Some anons rejections mean nothing, unless you have powerful arguments about how to extrapolate over the trends, which you don't. You merely go "nuh uh, AI and sex robots impossible for 10000 years because i said so".
>>20249523>Them and them and jews and jewsI wanna obsolete the jews
What are you doing, other than crying and constantly trying to stop it or get in the way? Are you so attached to the jews that you wanna keep them around forever?
>They made>They won't>They keepHyper-capitalism is coming, and no amount of "They this and they that" is going to stop it. You guys are shortsighted.
>We need to kill the politicians to get them.If you could do it, you would have. The fact that you try to bring others down and whine on a mongolian throat singing forum suggests that your plan of action is a summer night fantasy. Keep banging your head at the wall, surely it will work the 110th time!
