>>16542927>>16542933If it doesn't mean jack shit, why is the JIDF devoting manpower to threads trying to "debunk" it?
If it didn't work, it would be obvious when it failed to improve the quality of discourse.
We already know how to detect effective tools and discard poor ones.
Your shitty attempts to astroturf this away just fuel its legitimacy.
A real thread died for this.
