>>20752674>>20752684But have you seen this chart?
And have you considered that the last Burgers have finally gone through all of their plandemic savings and are now starting to look for a job again, which in turn lets them become statistically "unemployed" at first?
And the fact that as they were going through their savings, they weren't counted in unemployment?
Correct me where I'm wrong in my assumption that the higher unemployment rate mostly comes from either people AGAIN looking for employment who previously didn't need to be employed AND/OR unemployed immigrants first appearing and the statistic BUT NOT
>BUT NOTBUT NOT
>BUT NOTBUT NOT
from previously employed persons losing their employment en masse.
Somebody please debunk this if possible.
