>>834482You know what I don't get? We've had bans on various breeds of dogs, seeing them as being more prone to aggression. We've seen other animals, being a part of the same genus, being more aggressive than others of the same genus.
We state this as facts.... but when it comes to applying the same logic to humans, suddenly people lose their minds.
I am, in no way, suggesting that one group of people is somehow more superior to another simply because of this. No. I'm suggesting that it wouldn't be too farfetched to say that maybe a group of people may be more prone to violent, aggressive actions compared to another. And that these actions are not contributed solely to societal differences.
