>>1789868If you go one paragraph further, you see that I did take back the word.
>Re-stating my argument, take notice of how I take back "philosophical" and going more on the nuances of the actual question and how it is opaque by nature.See
>>1785969This was my actual argument, as I deemed that "philosophical" may not be the best word to describe it. Shortly after, for some reason, you sperged out with "philosphy" when I was already past that and I clarified my point.
You were attacking a strawman all the time. Swallow your pride.
