>>7734972We weren't talking about the invention of new technologies as an analogy to racemixing, we were talking about the production of alloys as an analogy to racemixing. And to consistently produce an alloy of high quality, the materials used in the process must be carefully inspected, measured, and the variables involved must be known. If substandard materials are introduced, the quality of production will fall, resulting in less quality metal. Similarly, if material of unknown calibre is used, the end result will be unpredictable--the 'trial and error' you speak of will invariably produce a mountain of failures for every success; heaps and heaps of slag for every decent sheet of metal is a very, very poor use of resources. And genetic material is an infinitely more precious resource than steel.
Earlier in the thread, someone mentioned interbreeding dogs to correct for genetic errors in a lineage. When they do that, do you think that a successful breeder is going to carefully select which dog they're going to breed, or would they let the dog loose and just let him hump whatever he comes across, and trust that it'll all sort out fine in the end?
As an aside, are you deliberately moving the goalposts, or are you so genetically incapable of admitting to the goyim that you're wrong that you're constantly reframing the narrative in your mind? I'm putting together a book, and I could use the information.
