>>11550188In ancient Rome, divorce was easy, and many of the most eminent Romans went through several marriages. An example. Cato divorced his wife Marcia, the mother of the famous Porcia, and Marcia married the orator Hortensius. Cato then remarried Marcia after Hortensius died. Why didn't either Hortensius or Cato consider Marcia to be "ruined," if sexual intercourse with another man ruins you for future marriages? There is no meaningful moral distinction between an eminent Roman woman who went through several marriages, and a woman in our modern society who has several long-term relationships. "Breaking up" a long-term relationship and getting an easy divorce are essentially identical.
An extremely high number of partners may argue that a woman lacks self-control or the ability to bond emotionally, but a small number, contrariwise, is not necessarily a proof of virtue. It may imply mere indoctrination, or even frigidity. What does it matter that your wife is a virgin if you had to get to her when young in order to have that, or her parents had to force the concept into her by fear or intimidation?
Don't let /pol/ indoctrinate you into being miserable. Don't let the idea that sex "taints" or "corrupts" a woman ruin your life. If Cato or Hortensius didn't believe it, why should you? You are letting the passion of jealousy rule over you. If your partner truly loves you, then the past has absolutely no bearing upon the present.
