>>12861693It's just a safe bet. With "evidence" for all sorts of mysterious stuff what happens most often is:
>something spooky gets leaked>everyone starts speculating and see it as true>use this to validate the belief>it gets debunked years later>no one takes note of that because not mysterious = not interesting and continue to believe whatever they wantI bet like 30 years from now that video will be said to have been some drone in an obscure government file and no one will take note of that.
