>>17463466> You dont give any credence to the element of free will.There's no denial of free will in what I've said.
> Do you understand what it means to expend ammunition in this context?This is irrelevant.
*HUGE* swaths of the Deep State could be ended with a few Executive Orders.
Many injustices could be righted simply by considering the Constitution to be the Supreme Law if the Land, AND ENFORCING IT AS SUCH.
This bullshit "we've got to let them expend all their ammunition!" is just another variant of "It was necessary!" and shows how willing and able you are to rationalize things, allowing evil...
But the real question is: to what end?
The Q claim is that it [re]institutes proper/Constitutional government...
but could it be more of "Operation Lock-Step" and other WEF/UN BS?
> How much ammunition does the deep state have?The Deep State could be deprived of their two greatest weapons —fear & secrecy— with only a few Executive Orders; such as one saying:
"Effective immediately, all classification prior to
Jan 1st 2010 is terminated and will, upon request, be made available to the public. A reasonable fee for media may be charged."
>Q said it clearly. FISA is the start. It goes both ways. Obama is nervous.Fuck you.
Obama is not nervous.
Neither is Clinton.
Neither is Biden.
Nor are any of the Deep State big-shots.
