Quoted By:
Western right-wing nationalists seem to have difficulties agreeing on religion. Mainly, on Paganism, and Christianity, and sometimes atheism, but I don’t really find their belief system attractive. With Paganism, it’s easy for foreign gods to be equated to other gods within a pantheon, perhaps even assimilated, but with Christianity it’s impossible to assimilate outside gods into it. Christianity has no violent offensive against those who would harm it, whereas Paganism, has clearly defined ideas of conquest and sacrifice to the deities through war and violence. And some amount of idea on the defense of it. It was only after Augustine’s Casus Belli, did Christianity develop ideas for war, and even then it wasn’t properly assimilated. I don’t think Christianity is exactly weak, in fact I think that the strongest individuals have been Christians. In many cases where Pagans or believers of other religions converted to Christianity, there seemed to be distinct facts that these people were somewhat heroic in their defiance. So I don’t exactly believe /pol/ whenever they claim that Christianity might be weak. However, I do believe /pol/ when they say that Christianity has no defined offensive for its own survival.
Why haven’t Christian and Pagan thinkers begin trying to assimilate into one another like Paganism would have done in the past? It’s very clear that Christ is similar to some gods within other pantheons: Odin, Krishna, etc, etc, etc… this union would surely create a more United right-wing.
