>>12964755Then why do they literally use flat earth as the reference to all their guiding systems, rocket systems etc?
https://nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdfWhat does it say retard anon?
page 102 pic related
2. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; General Equations of Motion for a Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft (Page 2, Section II) … “In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non-rotating earth are developed…”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20070030307/downloads/20070030307.pdf3. NASA Technical Memorandum 104330; Predicted Performance of a Thrust-Enhanced SR-71 Aircraft with an External Payload (Page 8 – Digital Performance Simulation Description) “The DPS equations of motion use four assumptions … a nonrotating Earth.”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88507main_H-2179.pdf4. NASA Technical Note: A Method for Reducing The Sensitivity of Optimal Nonlinear Systems to Parameter Uncertainty (Page 12 Problem Statement) … “(2) A flat, nonrotating Earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710018599.pdf5. NASA Technical Note; Calculation of Wind Compensation for Launching of Unguided Rockets (Page 8 Trajectory Simulation, 2nd Paragraph) …“this simulation assumes … the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat nonrotating Earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040008097.pdf6. NASA Technical Paper 2768; User’s Manual for LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program to Derive Linear Aircraft Models (Page 12, Program Overview) … “Within the program, the nonlinear equations of motion include 12 states representing a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating Earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf 