>>23969525> Low experience, highest conviction.That's not the Dunning Kruger effect either, you barely literate, uneducated moron. That's a modification of a common misunderstanding. The Dunning-Kruger effect is about how people who have low skill rate their skill as higher than it actually is. It is not about how people who are lowly skilled are the most confident. They aren't. The people who are most skilled tend to be the most confident.
Also, equating skill with experience is your own simple-minded contribution. While gaining experience generally makes you better at a task, that does not necessarily mean that a more experienced worker is the more skilled one. You, for example, have likely read a lot in your life, but it would not be surprising if a grade schooler had better comprehension.
>1) VERY few people "spend their life" flipping burgers. Burger flipping for most people is a temp job. They move on to something else.It's not about how many people are flipping burgers, you idiot. It's about how repeating a task does not make you better at every task.
>I'm not sure why you're implying that the average NEET spends his time studying philosophy, economics, psychology, and so on. You're not describing a NEET, you're describing an academic. There is no implication, only your worthless reading comprehension. I did not describe the average neet, I attempted to enumerate some of the components of understanding the world, which you claimed to possess more merely because you worked. Besides, It not that you need to be an academic to do something as simple as study. It is available to everyone with an internet connection, and even to some that do not. It sounds like study is so foreign to you, that you've handwaved it away to the academics.
