>>11669565>and we all evolved from OPs pic related over a course of millions of years as backed by mountains of scientific evidence from men far more learned than youTiktaalik has literally been debunked as an ancestor or transitional form in mainstream evoluiontard circles you absolute evolutiontard
They found well-developed amphibian footprints in strata they accidentally decided was 23 "million" years older than Tiktaalik fossil before that fossil was found(OOOPS!). There is absolutely no reason to think, whatsoever, that Tiktaalik ever evolved into a land dwelling species. The "evolutionary niche" would have "already been filled" and Tiktaaliks would be decimated by land dwellers.
https://www.livescience.com/6004-legged-creature-footprints-force-evolution-rethink.htmlBasically there is now a 40 million year gap where you idiots haven't found a single fossil to support your bullshit. BUT IT"S BACK BY MOUNTAINS OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE RIGHT??????? RIGHT?????? Pathetic
Stop being a sheep and think for yourself