>>12095020The problem with all of this is that there exists no Constitutional mechanism with which to undo the inauguration. Even if the lawsuit somehow is taken (it likely won't be, they'll find a way out of it), and even if evidence is able to be entered (so much time has passed much of it has likely been erased or destroyed), and even if they prove that Trump actually won the election, the question we arrive at is: "well... now what?" This has never happened before in our nation's history, and any solution the court attempts to implement will be like building an airplane while flying it. The court is there to interpret laws, not make them, and so any meaningful change would have to come from Congress, which is now firmly in Democrat hands (with many complicit RINO's).
Of course, that won't happen. Nothing will come of this. The Left was successfully able to intimidate the SCOTUS into throwing out the Texas lawsuit and delaying this lawsuit until after Inauguration Day, so this whole scenario is predicated on the Left suddenly having lost all of its leverage while simultaneously securing every branch of the government. The premise is faulty on its base.
Look, I know there was fraud, you know there was fraud, everyone knows there was fraud, but at the end of the day the most we will see out of this is some "serious talks about future election integrity" and then the entire thing gets memoryholed. Any other outcome starts the Boogaloo and the (((Elites))) fear an armed conflict above all others, because it signals the end of their hegemony.
Best case scenario this stuff gets declassified generations later ala JFK, when the lie has been repeated so often no one even notices the truth has finally been told.
