>>9097157Howdy!
>>9097175>it renders life to a much lower level of worthI would say it glorifies it insanely.
We are talking about age / disease etc. immortality, not bullet proof, planet crashing, nuclear devastation immunity. While yes, non-immortal lifes would clearly be of disposable worth to those few chosen, for whom life would bear a whole different dimension of worth.
In an utopian world, it does sound extremely romantic to arrange yourself a funeral after one thousand years of living - it would probably be a great holy day as well~
>can be more demoralising than what it would seem.Not if world evolves with you.
>>9097177I always pitied who cut themself while shaving until I became much more careless during it.
Really makes you think how your life can recess with time..
>>9097179Allo R'unner o/
World's a blank, no fun in vidya.
halp.
>>9097181>B0OKEUGsSounds like some wicked anime name.
>B00K EU idOh shi--
>>9097184>Also immortality... can be decent, but can also corrupt intensely.Even with a daily dose of cream puffins?
>PEP idu pervert ʕ•ᴥ• ʔ
>>9097191Alright, let's put it in slightly different words - would technologically increasing your lifespan be a bad thing?
>>9097217Sup Elliot o/
