>>16192033If they allow for it to, sure, it could eventually be out there. But even if that happened, it wouldn't go any farther than just being on the news. People would forget of everything that came out one week after, and instead move on to focus on what kind of spicy drama some random retarded YouTubers are going through that month, it's basically human nature at this point for it to be like this. Life is so fast-paced now that none of it matters and people instantly go on over to the next thing rather than dwelling on anything that doesn't personally impact them. If you're extremely powerful and somehow the public word of you doing something terrible got out, literally all you need to do is just wait a little for it to pass by and then go back to business as usual. Imagine the masses as a person sitting in a house that is burning, with a TV in front of them every once in a while broadcasting the house that they're about to burn to death in, but they can't really be bothered to get up because the chair is too comfortable and the other things they get to watch are fun.
And even right now, you could learn so much about all kinds of corruption and the fucked up shit that they get up to simply by searching for it. Thing is that it won't make any difference to anything for the moment as long as the same people are still in power, just what are you going to do about it? Keeping it that way isn't hard for them at all, once they get where they want to. But, that doesn't mean you shouldn't be aware of these things, ultimately it's good to have the knowledge circulating around. It's just that it'd only apply to make the odds of things better once a power vacuum appears after a major collapse, cause by then it would be important that the same kind of people don't get allowed the power again. I'd say that you and I would be too dead to see a societal collapse happen by the time it does, but, who knows at this point, maybe it'll be within the next couple generations even.
