>>13004666Nice trips, Satan.
>that would mostly be the girls do porn victimsI've heard of that case. Were they the women who got tricked into doing perfectly legal shoots but ended up being pretty much raped instead?
>you are romanticising sexual inexperiencePerhaps, but I think that learning together would make for good pair bonding.
>but we have tiger wones here too and those bitches don't mess aroundTiger mosquitoes? What are those like? I've heard about those huge ones not being threatening, it's just that I don't like the way they look. I mean dogs are much more threatening than mosquitoes, even the small ones, but not many people dislike dogs.
>dmca strikesI know that they were going to shut the sites down a while ago, and then recently they moved their servers outside the EU. Does DMCA have any value if the country the servers are in doesn't care about copyright?
>>13004640Didn't your mother teach you that it's impolite to call fat ladies pregnant? They can lactate after they've given birth too, but accuracy isn't the point of that picture.
Normally I'd say sure if you pay me, but not this time. It's in second person, like as if the narrator were talking to the woman. I think that makes it bad, but if that's what was requested of me... It reads like some kind of weird love letter.