>>12621882I meant you shouldn't want him to sperg out like you do. I saw you talking like it's some kind of achievement
You're right, it is nicer cooking when you have company. Is it wrong for me to want a family to cook for? Like to be a wife....
>I won't call you a womanThat's... kind of what I was talking about. I could go into detail as I have before about why I think you're wrong, but I doubt you would believe me anyway. Would you at least admit I have one of those other spirits? My kind, not yours
>which belief system brought more development to their respective nations?But at what cost? I think the natives, though they may not have enjoyed the same comforts, were perhaps happier with their existences. Whether this is because they allowed people to freely express the spirit of their soul or something else, I can't say. But it does raise a fair point - is the progress worth it if so many people are unhappy because of it? We've talked before about Kaczynski and you seem to agree that our modern life may not be condusive to happiness, so why are you now singing the praises of what brought about this life in the first place? I hope you don't think I'm responsible for that degeneration anyway
>ask them for 18th Century romance novels, rather than something that specificThat's probably a good idea. It's not quite as weird, though it might make things harder to find. I'll do a search online first anyway so I won't embarrass myself so much
>I will not have someone who takes it up the butt from an old guy lecture me on ageHey, if the ancients did it.... You know I was thinking about that recently. What is it about them that makes them hunger for a certain kind of young man? It's kind of a specific, almost pedophilic kind of homosexuality. It also makes me wonder about the whole gamut of age-related fetishes, including yours
Only because I was curious about it.... Isn't she? I don't usually use /a/, but there was a nice Ranma thread there recently. I found this too
