>>13501661>The tetragram is traditionally not pronounced except for in very specific ceremonies >The reason it's not pronounced is "don't take the name in vain lmao" - source ten commandments>it became in extremely bad taste to say outside of proper ceremony by the second temple period It's not very complicated. Jews don't even use the name; where it's written it's substituted - lord, theName, etc.
>WHY IS IT GOD NOW?Because fucking basic equivalence. This is honestly the most fucking stupid semantic bullshit I've ever fucking read and I'd believe a fucking kike wrote it. There are multiple possible origins of god as a word, but regardless it's fucking irrelevant because it's assumed meaning. Like Deus roughly mean skydaddy and took up the equivalence as well. So much so that Jews are like
>uh... we can't use the name of the lord in vain>but these words have sort of the same meaning>Can we use them in vain?hence g-d shenanigans.
>>13501601For Satan stuff, the complication becomes that Christianity has a lot of hellenist and later German influences in it. Judaism would be exactly what the frog would say
>Satan is under control of god, and his job is to be a challengerWhen you begin to see later influences, you get a drifting concept here. Even worse, canon tends to get poorly defined when you get to esoteric concepts because of the vast amount of splinters, apocrypha, church accepted philosophy, etc.
Personally, I'm really more confused by what diehard Christians need to have an excuse for cruel things that isn't god vibing. Like the old testament is a documentary on why Jews failed constantly after god decided to drown everyone. Second edition is god gets his son killed by sand dwellers so that he can sorta destroy the world again when he wants.