>>11488819Not onions, basedboys*. Autocorrect.
>>Part2:• Remember that these people also are RABID atheists and love a pseudo-intellectual discussion. They are not well versed in true spirituality because they do not understand it, because usually they come from less intelligent parents that are religious and can’t really explain why they do shit, or parents from a Protestant background where spirituality has just taken a backseat a long while ago.
None of them truly meditate, contemplate. Even in their approach to science, it is ego-based and not really open minded. They love to follow stuff/trends/others with religious fervour. Latest GIZMO, latest thing. Things things things things, not relationships.
A man _NEEDS_ to experience TWO things:
• To be in a prolonged physical altercation with another man, and win.
• To be at the complete mercy of someone and by totally humiliated after a physical fight. Book in face situation. It's a primer that creates character and humbles the man. A man who always wins will become arrogant.
Which brings up another point. We are being too civilized, afraid of confrontations. Yes, it's only natural to be avoidant of confrontations, especially for men since it has a lot worse consequences than for women. Every time men fight, there's huge wars erupting. But that is a sacrament to the Creator. It's all just part of the ebb and flow of shit.
Look how woman combat: sneakily and in roundabout manners. Weak men do the same.
That's why men are much more chill and less dramatic and let stuff go, less petty as it were.
