>>12616681Oh, well I never thought I'd support a Rivera either yet here we are. That thread is sickening...
>I don't think it specifies the maid's sex, does it?Of course it does, the maids in question are women specifically. And your kind was a thing since the decline of the Roman Empire. And they existed under Christianity too, but they only did it in private, because if they were caught... it depends, some were killed, others tortured. Many both.
>yes, please show me the good p*rn.No! I will not look at bondage again! But there must be some, yes. Sexualising maids was certainly a lot more socially acceptable than nuns.
>Are you wondering how your wife might age or something?It'd be pointless of me to think about that. But since I like old women, isn't it natural for me to think of how far I can push that age limit?
Would you like some more? And no, sorry, I only like women.
