Quoted By:
Seriously, if you don't want to pay attention to it, fine, but the seething, pathological wrath at people who don't entirely disregard Q has, at this point, made anti-Qtards no different from anti-Trumpers calling anyone a Nazi if they don't also hate him. Here's some of the dumb comments I keep seeing:
>everything he says is wrong
Other anti-Qtards say that everything Q says is shit /pol/ already knew, so how can he be wrong on everything if he's repeating shit /pol/ thinks is true?
>all his predictions have been wrong
He rarely makes actual predictions, despite the "Q predicted this" meme. there are some instances where he's seemingly predicted the deaths of people like mccain, but if anything it only demonstrates he knew when the news was going to report these things, which lends to the credibility of Q's "insider" status.
>it's cringe as fuck
Why, because it's in riddle form? This just seems like seething over the fact that Q took /pol/ redpills and put them in a format that doesn't appeal solely to people who browse /pol/, ultimately awakening far more people than /pol/ could ever hope to do. it redpills normies. wasn't this one of the goals of researching forbidden topics? or do /pol/tards prefer being in a "secret club" where you can all jerk each other off about how much more you know than the normies? because that's exactly how fucking secret societies work, and would make you no better than the groups you hate.
>it just pacifies people from doing what they should be doing
And what should they be doing? So far, the answer to this always ends up as violent or criminal activity. Some actually argue that boomers would march on DC with rifles and string up traitors from lampposts...but for some anon on an imageboard. Hell, a Qtard just finished winning a primary for a political office. Exactly what is Q keeping people from doing?
So, really, consider pic related. Consider that Q threads regularly get shoah'd like no other topic. Why the REEEEing?
