>>378675317Have you ever thought about the intricate nature of language? Why do you think some words existing in one language do not have an equivalent in others? Why some emotions, concepts and states of minds cannot be adequately be conveyed between speakers of different languages, unless the speakers have developed a intimate relationship with both language and mentality of their respective people? Now, imagine you wanted to propagate something as delicate as message from the creator - wouldn't you agree that a single error in translation, a divergence in lingustical range, an editorial decision can distort and twist the message to the point of incoherence?
While you may manage to convey the core modes and motifs of the language, any and all details become invetiably irrelevant. In terms of the 'Antichrist', the major takeaways should be:
>hubris and debauchery lead to bad times>dominate figures will eventually emergeAny judgement carried in the relayed message can and likely is a product of time and the human condition. Humans are fallible - I value faith and disregard dogma, there are no hard feelings involved.
