>>22531531>rent a boat and sail around the globeirrelevant, you can sail around the flat top of a circular table and wind up back where you started. does not prove a globe
>use the globe map>does it work? are the distances correct?uhh yeah, they literally constantly have to update the map, look up a magnetic declination map which proves they are skewing the globe. why is it that early sailors and navigators were getting lost by hundreds of miles when navigating via the globe?
>look at the ISS flying over your head at night>is it going straight? or in a circle?wow a plane flies in a straight line too, how does that prove anything? the "ISS" is not in "orbit", its just above earth like many things are
HERES HOW YOU CAN PROVE THE GLOBE:
1. in 2025 show some footage of a spinning sphere in outer space ideally zooming in to show buildings sticking out of the side / upside down stuck to it by "gravity"
2. demonstrate how earth is curving at 8 inches per mile squared even though no human on earth can possibly demonstrate it
BY THE WAY THE TOP PHYSICISTS WHO BACK UP THE GLOBE MODEL CONCLUDED THAT NO HUMAN CAN DEVISE AN EXPERIMENT TO PROVE WE'RE SPINNING AT ALL LOL!
"the sun is at rest and the earth moves" or "the sun moves and the earth is at rest" would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different coordinate systems - albert einstein, einstein and infeld, the evolution of physics, 1938 ED P. 248
we know that the difference between a heliocentric theory and a geocentric theory is one of relative motion only, and that such a difference has no physical signifiance - astronomer fred hoyle (astronomy and cosmology - a modern course (san francisco: W.H. Freeman & co, 1975) P. 416
earth is PROVABLY, REPEATABLY, MEASURABLY NOT a 3959 mile radius sphere. anyone who believes in the globe model is misled and just has BLIND FAITH in something they've NEVER INVESTIGATED
