>>14171386Society won't let people beat each other either - yet it happens.
But I get your meaning, what I'm trying to say is: is passing your genes worth the price? Being arrogant, assertive, dominant, selfish, brazen etc is always something people don't like, so forcing your will be demonized.
I personally don't care about passing on my genes, it does nothing for me individually. The only reason I feel attraction towards women is due to reproductive instinct, but since I don't care about it - women don't seem that pure and noble.
Like I stated here:
>>14171378>If men were individually smart about women, our species would've died long time ago - the blindspot men have towards women, our compassion and empathy is necessary for the survival of our species. Thus it is in the best interest of the species to perpetuate the ignorance.Thus my lineage won't pass on, unless I cave in someday, which is always possible. There is a type of women that could totally override all my self-interest, luckily for me they are the insecure shy-nerdy type who think they are too ugly and unsexy. The Becky type.
Of course I feel lust, I feel the urge to have sex, that's my biological imperative, my instincts, my genes screaming to get passed on. The genes don't care about my individual well being, they don't care what happens to me - it only cares about perpetuating itself. This manifests as just courting some random woman who is not defective (fat, retarded etc, I happen to find those repulsive, I think this repulsion is due them being unfit to survive) and cumming into her, then somehow make it work regardless what the living situation of either of us is. Now there are two approaches to this: quality or quantity.
In more primitive countries the more effective strategy is quantity, they reproduce at a higher rate because the environment is hostile, thus creating 10 kids and having 5 of them die due to ebola is better than having only 2 kids and having 5 of them die due to ebola.
