>>10555783The problem is that for men there isn't as much as risk as to have sex with as many women as you want other than STD's and creating whores which bites you in the ass later or other men.
Women on the otherhand always lose because their instinctual value is lowered.
I mean I can understand if you're a liberal but would you rather your wife had a loose cunt, STDs and didn't cook or clean or would you settle for the same woman again with a tight/unused cunt, clean mind but not blank, cooks and cleans, understand her place and that you being a provider is the half of that which makes her happy to be alive etc?
I mean it's like you're choosing a used run down uncomfortable car that no amount of fixing or TLC will ever restore it to what it was over a newly manufactured one or even a sportscar?
>inb4 that's reducing women to objects!Well it happens to men as well since you can't not be a provider and expect a trad wife or anything. She would be wasted on you and you won't win anything from it just lose your time when you would've been happy shagging whores and dying childless and misrable from a shotgun mouthwash or drug overdose. So yea it's not so one-sided and in favor of men as you think. Everyone sacrifices time and gets something greater in returns such as a healthy family/relationship and stronger/healthy society.
Also you can't just outright tell the majority of women they're useless now because that would cause bitching of epic proportions you just have to gently make them realize the bigger picture and slowly so the anger is spread out and not sudden. Men can always just cope with being fags/trannies or sleeping with said useless/undesirable women.
