>>15694971I have no time or interest to go over all this shit, as this have been debunked many times already. I will just point out a few obvious fallacies in the first points:
>Myth 11-All humans also share most its dna with chimps and other mammals, which shows that even a small difference in genes is enough to produce completely different phenotypes
2-Genetic diversity within populations means shit if the means are completely different between populations. Think of two normal probability distributions, one can be have a very high standard deviation (african diversity) and the other can have a small sd, but doesn't implies both distributions have overlapping values (genes).
>We might categorise people as white, black or brown, but these visual variations don't accurately reflect the genetic differenceDemonstrably false, see pic (funnily enough I can't post because the system think its spam, this place is more compromised than I though...)
>Myth 2>But this is neither what history, nor genetics, tell us. In fact, no nation is static.There are clear relationships between genes and geographical origin, any modern human genetic study shows that. If these relationships didn't exist it would be impossible to trace the ancestry of people through genetic analysis.
>"Nevertheless, every Nazi has Jewish ancestors" Absolutely unprovable fantasy from Dr. Rutherkike
>Myth 3European migrations is very different from subsaharian african migration. Subsaharian african genes were almost inexistent in europe before the development of modern mass transportation tech.
