>>9954554Text does not stutter. Everything I wrote in the post you are referring to is 100% true and makes absolute sense.
Case in point:
>you're telling me that not a single soul other than the King listened to Saint Ansgar, who, for some reason, is called the Apostle of the North?There is no apostle of the north in the bible, nor are there saint Ansgars in the bible, the 'holy scripture of Christianity and the immutable word of the one and only truth and god"
The Europeans everydayman, just like today who accepts that it really is good to allow homosexuality and all that shit, really took that "immutable word of god" seriously.
Because believing in such things allows us to form contracts and superhero charge our cooperation, to have trust like that.
However, since THAT WARPED VERSION was born, means that the missionaries who spread Christianity did not care about "immutable word of god", whereas Europeans would have done so.
This is because Christianity is a jewish servant cult and the jews who spread it didn't care bout integrity, they just cared about gaining as many converts ,and therefore supporters, as possible.
just like they do today with degeneracy like homosexuality.
They don't care that Bi means specifically two, and then throw it into LGBT whatever even though that destabilized the entire thing.
They just want degeneracy like that accepted because it plays into their cards.
The leaders accept and push this, the rabble takes it seriously.
Christianity is no exception, it is the same deal.
Everything I wrote makes perfect sense.
There are no apostles of the north, there is no saint ansgar, it's a third party edition that violates the immutability of the perfect and true god and his immutable word of truth that cannot be altered.
But the jews who spread it didn't give a fuck.
In fact, it helped them put 'heretic' vs 'heretic' 'cuz all accepted their alterations as that one word, etc, I hope you have enough folds in your brain to understand
