>>20869933my point is that disergarding intellectual "property" laws isn't an attack on capitalism.
it is at best an attack on some aspects of the current political system which isn't fully capitalist.
it is considered "property" under our current legal system just as taxation is considered "legitimate",
that doesn't make it property, (and it doesn't make taxation legitimate), just because a piece of paper said so.
capitalism isn't the current economic system.
capitalism is a defined concept and the current system may come closer or stray further from capitalism.
according to your ideas, disregarding minimum wages laws or evading taxes would be anti-capitalist because it goes against the law of supposedly mainly capitalist countries
