>>12676845Best secondhand stores are out in the sticks. They won't charge you $10 for a cookie sheet and they have more cast iron at a better price.
>>12676847>>12676849Agree. I've been doing some research, trying to compile a simple list describing the most common yet wearable styles of jewelry that aren't ugly modernist bullshit. I'm thinking things with hearts (butterflies and flowers are more immature and better suited as a gift to your daughter than to your wife. General knowledge is when your daughter is of eligible age, you give her one nice piece of jewelry so that she doesn't fall for the first boy to give her a trinket), things that say "mom", lockets because they become personal once you add a photo/drawing in them, gemstone pendants if you're into verifying gems, stud earrings with a heart, a sparkle or a metal ball, and dangle earrings with a heart, a sparkle, or a metal ball. Earrings have to be in surgical steel, sterling, or high-kt gold, no plating (not that you'd get that anyways) because lots of women have nickel allergies and know to avoid the types of metals that give ear infections. Bracelets are iffy because if the woman is really tall or really thin/petite it might not fit or stay on her wrist. Necklace chains seem like a good idea because clasps wear out eventually and you can wear them alone or put a pendant on them.