>>12438713Umm thank you. There is a way you might help me, but - well...
>On my dreams, you mean?No, on transgender people. You don't see them as what they are because of surface level details. In fact that's your whole argument against them. I just think that someone who believes in the power of his own mind might be able to relate somewhat to the powers of other's, and instead of judging them based purely on what you can see with your eyes, find a way to see things more deeply
>that's not really a gender thing, is it?I guess not, and again I'm sorry for making you talk about it so much... but that's kind of my point. You should be able to look past those other things and see them as they really are
>I want to see the biological evidence as wellI'm not sure what you're asking for is possible, at least with our current level of technology. No one's going to spontaneously grow ovaries or testes to support their claim, so then what does that leave us with? Only an appeal to emotion. After all this is a human matter at its heart. Since we cannot rely on what our bodies present us with, we have to use our feelings to sort out what is true
Maybe you just have a hard time relating to it. I wonder... what if you were to have a child someday and they turned out this way too? Would you accept their terms and see them how they really want or would you go against their wishes and see them only as an incomplete person? This is how you should look at it - think of them how you would someone close to you, and if you still can't bring yourself to accept them, then we have your answer
>What is a "superstraight"?Someone who refuses to date transgender people but posed as a seperate sexuality. It was a thing on R3ddit. They even had their own flag as a parody - black and orange. I'm not sure what happened exactly, but there was some controversy about it that reached /lgbt/
>I'll write one separate scene by the end of AprilThis is the smut scene, right? Will it appeal to me too?
