Quoted By:
Chinkshills are probably worse than russian ones by now. The russian ones are highly emotional russians and retarded indians, so the blabber nonsense and spam slurs, which at least has some entertainment value. The chinkshills just post the same four infographs and make completely baseless claims repeatedly while having zero knowledge on any military tech not involved with their current PR campaign. Talking to them is like talking to a brick wall that can only regurgitate its script.
By the way, the US had the same type of thing back in WW2. Why dont we use it? Parts wear, reliability, and the fact that a lighter .50 still doesnt make a .50 MG a practical infantry weapon. The chinks are catching up to 1943. Great. This designer would go on to work on the Bradley’s Bushmaster cannon, by the way. Naturally, they may try to claim their model is more practical, more reliable, the parts last longer, but they don’t have any numbers to prove this, at least no numbers anyone but them will agree are factual.
