>>8844012i meant you'll like the controversy. i'm sure the game's shit
well while i agree i'd say the statement being controversial is pretty reasonable
seems more likely than being a coincidence. it really does remind me of the toll this website has on people's brains though. i've told this story to like 6 people at this point and the only one i didn't have to explain the percentage to was a guy who browses /b/
probably not
>>8844042sleep tight agc
