>>15576185>we as in who? You? Or some people from /qa/?what
>>15576211 said is true, there are conspiracies behind who started the raid (whether it was /qa/, the sharty or someone falseflagging)
if you don't know there's an imageboard for soijaks made by a guy for /qa/ which is closely related to /qa/
>get rid of an entire board because of a raid doesn't that happen all the timeit did happen all the time, the aforementioned raid was nothing special compared to post-/qa/-deletion raids like picrel
the raid was an excuse, if they had a problem with it the would've banned everyone and wiped half of /qa/'s catalog, which would already happen multiple times a week
