>>7155324I dunno. Fading out the opacity while overlapping the other layer maybe? They probably have a special category for transitions, don't they?
>>7155339>do you guys have some sort of spat with huawei?More like the opposite. They're probably in bed with some people at the top cause they were recently contracted as suppliers for a lot of infrastructure tech even though it was already becoming known they were into shady shit.
Our government is unfortunately extremely corrupt in spite of appearances.
